Ahmadinejad claims US slavery a hoax
by Dave Weinbaum
Thursday, October 1, 2009
(Dave Weinbaum is a regular contributor of one-liners and commentaries to
many regional and national publications and web sites, including the Reader’s
Digest, National Enquirer and Forbes and is a regular pundit for the www.
jewishworldreview.com Readers can reach Dave at dwquote@prodigy.net or his
websitewww.daveweinbaum.com. Listen to the Dave Weinbaum Radio Talk
show on KTTR 99.7 FM and 1490 AM on Friday Mornings starting @ 9:05)
In an astonishing change of verbiage, President Obama’s favorite let’s-sit-down-to-chat
Islamofacist, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has left the Holocaust denial business momentarily for a
new claim. Mad (our president’s endearing nickname for the little Hitler wannabe) said, “Slavery
never occurred in the USA . It was a hoax to get welfare, Affirmative Action and elect Obama
president. America is an enemy of Islam! We will wipe you off the map!” He claimed this just as
Iran ’s second underground nuke plant was exposed to the world.
This precipitated a heated phone call from Dear Leader to Jihad Central in Tehran : “Hey Mad,
what’s up with the slavery lie? Thought we agreed it was okay to denounce the Jew Hallycoaster
thing, but why are you calling slavery a fake?”
Mad: “Mr. President, I may be Mad, but I’m NOT one of your stupid Kool-Aid drinkers! At the
UN, Little Devil Netanyahu gave irrefutable evidence that the Holocaust really happened. I had to
maintain at least a falafel of credibility. In case you hadn’t noticed, evil revolutionaries have taken
to the streets.”
Obama: “I was too busy chairing the UN Security Council--you know the one where we vowed
to rid the world of all nuclear weapons?!”
(Two full minutes of laughing from both.)
Obama: “Mad, didn’t I support you and the Mullahs when you stole that election and Persians
were rioting in the streets? Didn’t you hear that fool Zbigniew Brzezinski call for the US to shoot
down Israeli planes that might attack you? Couldn’t you have found something else to mock?”
Mad: “Like what?”
Obama: “Well, you could pick on the Christians for a change.”
Mad: “Aren’t YOU a Christian?”
Obama: “Oh yeah. Sometimes I forget. Mad, you can’t ridicule slavery. It’s the basis of my
power. My backers are blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, 60’s radicals, Socialists,
Communists, anarchists, Muslims, Hollywood , and all whites stupid enough to feel guilty about
stuff they had nothing to do with. I’ve even got the support of 80% of American Jews!
(Three minutes of hysterical rib-cracking laughter from both.)
Mad: “I thought your lineage didn’t come from slavery. Wasn’t your mother white and your
father a black Kenyan Muslim?”
Obama: “Yeah, but if you look, walk, and talk like an angry slave victim…Besides, how do you
think all those blacks got into the USA ?”
Mad: “Illegal Immigration! The point is there’s much less proof of slavery happening than six
million Jews slaughtered by the Germans. Our Nazi heroes kept too many records, and there are
still Hebe survivors, with numbers tattooed on their arms. Why, oh Allah, why!?”
Obama: “All right. How long before the world forgets Bibi’s speech? Can you believe I’m getting
pressure to actually talk to General McChrystal in Afghanistan ? I can only stall on his request for
troops for so long. Forty-three US soldiers have been killed since I shelved McChrystal’s plea. I’m
gettin’ all sorts of heat.”
Mad: “And, thanks to Allah, you’re such a talented con man! I give it another week, Bam and
Netanyahu’s speech will be totally forgotten.”
Obama: “Okay, then you’ll get back to the Hallycosty denial, right?”
Mad: “As Allah is my witness, Mr. President. Let me add, the Mullahs and I appreciate the
stranglehold you’ve put on Israel .”
Obama: “All in the name of peace, Mad. But I’m warning you; if you don’t back off the slavery
BS, I’ll lay into your nuke plants like Glenn Beck just nailed Valerie Jarrett.”
Mad: “Heaven Forbid!”
Obama: “Asalami, my Mad friend.”
Mad: “May children throughout the world continue to sing your praises!”
Obama: “All praise to ME!”
Mad: “Kerr Khar Bokker! (kiss my donkey’s p#&*%#@s.)”
Obama (hearing Snickering mullahs in the background): “Uh, what’s THAT mean?”
Mad: “Long live President Obama!!!” As full laughter breaks out in Jihad Central.
Obama: “Okay, then off to Copenhagen . Gotta bring back the billions to pay off my peeps….I
mean gotta get those Olympics for Chi-town!”
Pledges to "wipe
America off the map"
calex59
Well, I see that Bozo’s strategy of sitting down and talking to people has worked out worked out
well with Imanutjob, he seems to have embraced Bozo with both arms./SAR
familyop
So he does listen to his neo-Nazi trading partners.
Bobkk47
Satire alert!
SMARTY
Nice... Muslim caliphs and pirates were the most prolific slavers on earth until the 19th century
... every Muslim kingdom in the world was bankrolled by profits from slaving. No slavery????
Oldpuppymax
Slavery a hoax? No. But it has been USED very effectively.
Rick Dingess
That was great...a unique approach to get the point across.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Thanks for the compliment, Rick.
Pam Siegfried
Maybe someone ought to ask Maddie about slavery, particularly the bit about Muslim slavers
selling Africans to the Americans, (having purchased them from other Africans who took them
slaves inthe first place if memory serves.) He just might say something like your column here.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Thanks for your input Pam.
Robert Berger
Even though I'm a liberal, I like your humor a lot. That's not to say that I agree with everything
that liberal politicos, commentators, celebrities and others say or everything they do, but as far as
I am concerned, there are just as many conservative morons as liberal ones, and it's hard to say
which are worse.
It's often like choosing between pneumonia or some equally bad ailment.
And if Obama's social and economic policies are so awful, do the conservative politicians in
Washington have better ideas ? I doubt it. Theirs are probably worse,in fact.
But I think the notion that he's some evil communist dictator out to take all our freedom away
and turn us into some totalitarian dictatorship is absolutely asinine.
Sure, he's far from perfect, but as Churchill said, Democracy is the worlst form of government,
except for all the rest. Obama is the worst president, except for all the rest.
And regarding your weekly top ten, here's one of mine: The only mental exercize most people get
is jumping to conclusions. How's that?
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Robert,
Love the quote and thanks for the comments.
potlatch
We call him ‘nut-job’ but this guy is a blithering IDIOT!
Wonder if he believes he was born!
autumnrain
Guys, this didn’t happen. Please read the tags or something. I’m always afraid someone is going
to read these satires and go off sounding like a goon for telling others. It’s that old Gossip or
Telephone game from school.
Learsfool
Guys, this didn’t happen.
With this muzzie nut (Ahmanutjob, not Obammy), it's sometimes hard to tell what's satire and
what's not.
devolve
Yup
Satire too!
potlatch
Sure was, you cought that one!
devolve
It wuz knot subtle enuf
No subluminal stof ether
potlatch
You read the articles better than I do.
devolve
You are on zippy-band
You should be faster than I am
potlatch
I said ‘better’, not faster.
Usually I skim over them and certain words stand out.
devolve
OK
I miss a few things too
potlatch
Really? LOL
chris_bdba
Has anyone bothered to tell Obama how blacks are viewed in the Middle East yet?
craigeryjohn
New low, Dave...really digging for any negativity aren't you.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Thanks Craiger,
Now I know it's a pretty decent column.
rolla_native
Jeez, Dave - what's wrong?? Nearly 50 comments on the drunk Newburg mayor article, and only
two here??? It appears Rolla's citizens have their priorities in order.
You really need to take your talent to another locale - where it can be better appreciated.
What's that?? You're a big fish in a tiny pond, spending your own money to be on the radio and
publish cornball calendars?
Never mind.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Hey Native,
Column's been up about 6 hours most in the middle of the night. Let's see what it is a week from
now. Seems last 50 or so have had pretty good responses. Last week it was close to 100,
probably an all time RDN record.
Maybe, on occasion, you could enlighten us with a few ideas instead of harping on everyone
else's.
Old Prof
Dave, I really like the effort to string your opinions together in a consistent thread. The humor is
pretty good. This is one of your better creations. Apparently you had time to creat this one. I
couldn't disagree more with your depiction of our President in the majority of your opinion
pieces. However, I do admit to appreciating your intellectual power, when you have time to fully
deploy same.
Bulldogger
But, but, but..... Oboma's lip marks are still visible on Ahma's ass, what went wrong?
Getoverit
If your working for wages, your a fking slave even today. It is just a matter of how little money
you sold your ass to.
aaronssongs
Wow. That ought to be right up some folks alley. Bet we have a lot of "MAD" sympathizers up
in here. Slavery was a hoax. It didn't happen. Everyone knows that.
RecordDeficitPrez
Ahmdadinejad is a flake any way you slice it
xoplytnyk
Only if you are dumb enough to listen to Israeli translations.
Boaedica
I cannot figure out what the point of this thread is, except to waste my time.
Mission accomplished, I guess.
RecordDeficitPrez
Last time I checked, our newspapers and talking heads used the English language - not Hebrew.
xoplytnyk
Last time I checked, Ahmadinejad speaks Farsi. He can speak English.
RecordDeficitPrez
Very good. That would be why we utilize English translations, instead of your implied Israeli
translations. Especially since when he goes on his rants, he does so in Farci.
RonPaul
Drop the uranium enrichment program or we will blockade you, too passive approach from the
Obama Administration towards Iran for you? A sane president would wait for there to be the
slightest bit of evidence that indicates Iran is going to make a weapon, and would be short of
virtually declaring war in the form of a blockade. Half of America's government spending will
continue to go to the military, financing the world police on a planet of 6 billion, you won't listen,
just keep on promoting the agenda of the people manipulating you. You really are an insignificant
creature.
Mr.Vashman
Uhhhh...are you f***ing kidding me?!
Ahmedinajhad (however the hell you spell it) literally prays for the swift return of their chosen
one in one of his speeches who, by the way, only returns after "the world is bathed in blood". He
has even publicly stated that he wants to wipe Israel off the map. Are you so stupid and naive to
not have a lick of sensible foresight??? Yes, you can spout your anti-military, anti-war agenda all
you want, and if enough join you, that may affect this country's militaristic action. But Mr.
Ahmedinajhad will still blow whoever he feels like off the map if we LET him, because we all
know the UN won't do anything unless they actually grow some testes. That's why our missile
interception system is so important, but Obama doesn't even seem to think so. Great president.
YES, we can actually SAVE lives with military action, believe it or not!
Damn 'peace' loving hippies. Let me ask you this. Would you rather just leave the rest of the
world to its business, wars and all, because you're afraid we'll be called 'world police' or would
you rather we save some lives? You know, conserve the human race? Technology is becoming
amazingly advanced and is getting close to the point where we won't have to send any troops in
the middle of battle OR use lethal means of ending conflicts. The day is coming, so lets hope....
No. Let's PRAY the world doesn't plunge into utter chaos before then.
NaughtyWord
Saving lives through killing.
/snicker
Sounds like fucking to preserve virginity to me.
Boadicea
Good analogy!
Avenger_Of_Justice
Excellent. I agree with Boadicea. It's like the same morons who think that we can avoid wars by
"pre-emptive" actions.
You know, like how Bush contradicted himself by saying that he's giving up on "free market"
principles (as if Bush was ever "free market") to save the "free market." I'm amazed Yale can
churn out such horrific idiots.
NaughtyWord
Oh I don't believe its a reflection of Yale's quality. Let's be honest for a moment, with the
surname "Bush" little George could have done nothing but sniffed glue and ate crayons and still
would have graduated with honors.
Avenger_Of_Justice
Haha, nice one!
Anyway here's a funny video on Bush. Enjoy.
http://www.huffingto...in_n_65171.html
"Fiscally responsible with the people's money" LOL
I wonder which fake conservatives actually bought into his lies. (Well, they might not be lies...a
lie is something someone intentionally tells with knowledge that the statement is false. Bush is so
clueless he might think they're
Mr.Vashman
I can see why you support Alan Grayson because you are about as observant as he is. (that's an
insult, though I don't think you're savvy enough to understand why). 'Saving lives through killing'.
Though partly true, that's not what I said or was even leaning toward. Killing should be avoided
AND PREVENTED whenever possible, but let's face it, there are people that don't deserve to
live in this world. No I'm not talking about innocent unborn children, you moron. I hope you
aren't so naive as to not have an inkling of what I'm talking about, because giving you examples
wouldn't be allowed on this forum for censorship reasons. Words just don't deliver the impact of
the atrocities, either.
So just try to break out of that fantasy land you live in where people around the world are all
good and will act appropriately like you want them to and REALIZE that there are evil people in
this world that want to do atrocious things and WILL do them if they are allowed to.
...unless you just don't give a rat's @ss. And if that's the case, may God have mercy on and
forgive you and kin, because you wouldn't even see it coming when someone on your bus, plane
or train blows up and kills you because that someone was indoctrinated to hate America. I bet
you'd be scared s#!+less if it was your life in jeopardy like that, but when it's someone and their
family half-way across the globe groveling to be spared death, you couldn't possibly care less
because you'd rather sit back to let it happen. Cowardly. You and your kin of mind....nice people,
eh?
And in response to this, you'll most likely come up with a nice little rebuttal that will just prove
my points. I hope that's not your certain future, though.
NaughtyWord
You are such a tool it is beyond any empirical measure.
In no way did I say I was against war, for war, or for doing nothing. You just assumed
(incorrectly) that I am anti-war. Next time, don't let your assumptions blind your reason. Now
that I've aired that error on your part I will articulate the point of my prior post.
To sit, and claim, that we are fighting the a war to "kill bad guys" is painfully short-sighted and
usually used as a pathetic attempt at rhetoric. No, we didn't go in and kill Saddam because he was
a bad guy, we killed him for a number of political, geo-political, and paranoid reasons. Which,
according to the resolution for war against Iraq, chiefly involved with the belief that he either had
or was manufacturing weapons of mass destruction. Now I'm not going to get into the legitimacy
of said claim because that would be digressive. We didn't start a war with Imperial Japan because
they were 'mean people', we went to war with them because they attacked us. Nazi German
because they declared war on us. No war in the United States was to kill people because they
were "evil".
Never happened, never will happen. If killing bad guys is our point, well shit, there is a whole
mountain of them in Africa. Why don't we go after those genocidal assholes? Oh yeah, there's no
gain.
So if you want an Iran War to prevent them from developing nukes, then just say that, if you
want a war because they are infringing international law then say that, but to sit here and spout
that we need to go kill them because they are big meanie heads is a ridiculous position that
deserves to be ridiculed.
Mr.Vashman
I'm a tool? I don't have a f***ing giant portrait of Alan Grayson (of all people...really?) or anyone
else in my signature.
And only help or fight if you think there's some kind of gain....liking saving innocent civilian lives
isn't gain enough.
I was particularly responding to RonPaul when the phrase anti-war was said, so relax. . . but your
scoffing response, 'Saving lives by killing, /snicker' pretty much told me you didn't understand the
point of the previous post OR that you were pretty much for not doing anything. One of the
two. So I tried to elaborate a bit...in vain, as always. I was just drawing upon your own words.
Oh, that whole developing nuclear weapons and intentionally infringing upon international laws
because of hate for other countries and Japan attacking our harbor and killing so many people
pretty much falls in stride with the 'evil' and 'bad' I was speaking of. Try to mentally make these
connections...I know you're atheist and all, but can you really say you don't believe there's evil?
If so, then that's naivete` at its most dangerous.
Hold on! I'm not assuming you do or don't believe in something. That's why it was a question. so
don't kill yourself posting a 'You assume!' reply again.
As a matter of fact, let's just cut the "I'm offended you assumed" s#!t altogether. We're not
pregnant women, here.
I won't beat around the bush. Yes, if Iran is developing nuclear weapons and intends to use them,
let's go to war with the bastards! Those genocidal bastards in Africa? Incarcerate those mofo's!
Get 'em out of there somehow. How could you not assume this stuff from when I said before that
'there are some people in this world that don't deserve to live' (and I'll add 'that don't deserve to
live amongst society')? C'mon! A little advice... You can't be SO unassuming that you come off as
retarded. You can't be afraid that you're going to offend somebody because that prevents
assumption. That's for pu$!3s and doesn't get s#!t done. Reasonable assumption to a certain
degree is very important. If you don't even have that, then you're going to want the government
or somebody to hold your hand for your entire life. You won't be able to think for yourself.
You'll REALLY be 'a tool', as you like to say. So go ahead and assume, offensive or otherwise.
This isn't really directed specifically to you.
NaughtyWord:
but can you really say you don't believe there's evil? If so, then that's naivete` at its most
dangerous.
"Evil" is a word, just like any other word in our language it has meaning behind it, purpose so to
speak. That said, "evil" is a religious word with religious implications. Something I am not
inherently connected to, which is why I don't use the word. It is void in my lexicon as a whole.
Does that mean I believe people are incapable of unbelievably repulsive acts? No. To suggest so
would have a requisite of willful ignorance of encyclopedic knowledge of human history. I don't
believe these people, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or Xerxes committed their reprehensible acts because
some mythological demon whispered in their ear to do so, I believe it was done by their own
internal humanity.
As a matter of fact, let's just cut the "I'm offended you assumed" s#!t altogether. We're not
pregnant women, here.
Sounds like a plan as long as you agree not to call me a craven fool because I'm anti-war or anti-
military.
Yes, if Iran is developing nuclear weapons and intends to use them, let's go to war with the
bastards! Those genocidal bastards in Africa? Incarcerate those mofo's! Get 'em out of there
somehow.
Great! Now we're making strides to some serious headway. My point however didn't come from
my mind or say, my beliefs. However, my question was specifically aimed at those who say "We
need to go bomb so-and-so because they are evil bastards!" Well fine, but why is it, the worlds
most powerful nations criticize actions committed by Saddam, and Ahmadinejad, but turn a blind
eye to genocidal dictators in other places on the Earth?
xoplytnyk
Drop the uranium enrichment program or we will blockade you, too passive approach from the
Obama Administration towards Iran for you? A sane president would wait for there to be the
slightest bit of evidence that indicates Iran is going to make a weapon, and would be short of
virtually declaring war in the form of a blockade. Half of America's government spending will
continue to go to the military, financing the world police on a planet of 6 billion, you won't listen,
just keep on promoting the agenda of the people manipulating you. You really are an insignificant
creature.
Iran is doing nothing illegal or that they are allowed to do under the NPT.
Very good. That would be why we utilize English translations, instead of your implied Israeli
translations. Especially since when he goes on his rants, he does so in Farci.
Israeli's do the translating.
Pay attention.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Prof,
Thanks you for your kind words. I try my best with every column. You never know which ones
people are going to like. I just keep plugging away every week.
Have a nice weekend!
Rolla Observer
Still pretty pathetic that the RDN's only 'opinion column' is the back-woods, chrome domed Sean
Hanity.
Dave, when Sara Palin told Kati Couric (sp?), 'I read all of them', did she really mean just the
RDN? That would explain a lot of things.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Observer,
You mean the next President of the USA, Sarah Palin?
As to the RDN choice of using my columns, that's the ONLY one that's coming in...weekly. Why
don't you put your keyboard to your fingers and show us what liberal enlightenment YOU can
give to offset my 'opinion column(s)?'
The truth of the matter is no one else is sending them anything, but me.
Gail Kaplan
Dave,
That's one HELL of a column that you wrote yesterday in JWR. I told my brother that you and I
correspond and he was pretty impressed. (He, too, is a Conservative.) But, he did mention that
he doesn't like everything that you write. I hope he liked this one. I sent it off to him.
Did you receive a lot of hits, on your website, from this article?
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Gail,
Thanks for your comments and contributions the website.
I’ve had over 100 comments and counting. It was posted twice on Free Republic , receiving over
2,000 hits in about 20 hours, more than any one AP or major newspaper story I can find. There
were 60 comments alone from the Freepers.
Thanks for your friendship.
Send this to your bro.
If we agree on everything it makes one of us unnecessary.
Too bad I haven’t figured out how to make money at this!
Deb Segal
There's something to be proud of...the Rush Limbaugh of the Ozarks. Hope you're not a druggie
like he is.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Hey Deb,
How’d that Olympic thingy go?
Did you broadcast all those intricate deals between Vallery Jarrett, Rezko, Obama, and Daley?
Heard they were gonna make millions on those condemned slum buildings on the SS in fed
taxpayer dollars if Chi-town got the Olympics?
It’s called journalism. c-BS and you ought to try it.
PS. If Limbaugh’s a druggie, maybe those of you in the fringe media ought to try it. Even the
NYTimes has assigned someone to monitor Rush, Beck, etal. So THEY can find out what the rest
of the country already knows.
Deb Segal
You know Davey, I don't take drugs. Never did. Don't practice what I don't preach. Don't like
abortion either--prefer castration. Should we go on?
I'm thrilled we didn't get the Olympics. And I lobbied against it in the face of a lot of folks who
were very pro. The world still hates us because of George Bush. Get over yourself!
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Debbie,
“The world still hates us because of George Bush. Get over yourself!” ROFLMAO!!!
Yep and how’s that Obama apology tour (even during his Olympic pitch) workin’?
Davey
PS. “Don't like abortion either--prefer castration.” What are you a femanazi?
Deb Segal
No and I didn't marry out of my religion Mr. Super Jew....Like I said, I practice what I preach.
Much love....
Dave Weinbaum replies:
“No and I didn't marry out of my religion Mr. Super Jew....Like I said, I practice what I preach.”
Once again ROFLMAO!!!
And I did it TWICE! Please, oh PLEASE, don’t tell my Rabbi, or worse yet, the Chassidic Jew
who owns JWR! Oops, too late. They have both met my wife. Worse yet……SHE’S
GERMAN!!!!!!
I realize you’ve had tough breaks in your life, but it doesn’t give you the largesse to ignore fact
and attack peeps personality, marital choices, or drug habits. If you’re in the “news” business
you’ve got an obligation to cover “all” sides, even stories that don’t agree with your politics.
Who uncovered, Van Jones, Rezko, Rev Wright, Obama’s, ACORN, SEIU thugs being sent out
to town halls, Obama’s wealth redistribution comments, Obama’s tape saying he wanted ONLY
gov’t controlled HC, etc? We all know it was Rush, Hannity, O’Reilly, Beck, and a 25 yr. old
posing as a pimp and a 20 yr. old posing as his ho. THAT’S THE KIND OF JOURNALISM
THAT MADE CBS THE MOST RESPECTED NEWS ORGANIZATIONS IN HISTORY.
What the hell happened to your once-proud industry?
Davey
Bill Kramer
Congratulations Dave!!!
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Thanks Bill.
Vern and Fran
Now don’t you just love it!!?? Love the comment of the Rush Limbaugh of the Ozarks, keep it
up Dave and maybe some of those Liberals will someday see the light, but trust me I’m not
holding my breath.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Thanks Vern and Fran!
Julie Jacob
Awsome job Dave the Rush Limbaugh of the Ozarks!!! I want your autograph
Dave Weinbaum replies:
The guy’s just selling his website. But If you insist….
shorttimer
John McCains campaign manager yesterday said that it would be a mistake for the Republican
Party to nominate Sarah Palin but if they did he believes she not only could not win but the Party
would loose by a landslide. Has anyone noticed that even McCain will not come out and indorse
her? Many of the Republicans are now starting to act as if they have a little common sense.
Many are now stating that the 'birthers', etc., in the party are just plain nuts.?
carpenter
I hope they nominate 'I can see Russia from my front porch palin' thats the only way Obama can
get a second term. old PATROIT Sean should be waterboarded.
rollarn
Ahmadinejad thinks that slavery was a hoax to get welfare in the US? And Affirmative action?
And to elect President Obama? Dave, please set him straight!
Please tell him that US welfare programs started in the colonies; long before Africans were
brought here. Let him know that the Civil War Pension program in the 1800's wasn't put in place
to benefit slaves. And remind him that the modern-day welfare programs that began in the great
depression came about to help white people who LOST their jobs; black people never had them
in the first place! Please inform him that African Americans have really only had access to
welfare programs for about the last 60-70 years, while white Americans have had these programs
for about 230 years. If more blacks today are receiving government benefits than whites, I'd say it
because we've had a 170 year head start.
(I'm white and I actually received WIC when my husband was in the Army. The US Army. I
wonder if Ahmadinejad thinks the Army is a hoax to get welfare...? Come to think of it, they
actually give free healthcare handouts too. What a bunch of socialist leeches, wouldn't you say?)
And Affirmative Action? He's misinformed there too. I attended a predominantly black college in
NC in the early 90's. Guess what...I qualified for a minority scholarship! Did I mention that I'm
white? But I can see how Ahmadinejad wouldn't understand or agree with promoting ethnic
diversity and minimizing disadvantages. Can you believe that there are actually some Americans
that agree with him?
And as far as slavery being the catalyst to getting Obama elected, well, what does Ahmadinejad
know about elections? I guess by his standards, 5 million votes from a minority could easily win
an election among 200 million voters. Hey, I have a theory. I think the 2000 American election
might have actually been the model for the 2009 Iranian elections!
Anyway Dave, please just let 'Mad' know that he's seriously mistaken. I know he's a racist pig
regarding Jewish people...and calling him that is really going too easy on him...but on the issue of
American race relations, he's actually starting to remind me of this American that I know of.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Just don't get the satire thingy, RN, do you?
Dave Whinebaum
Allowing free speech to someone doesn't amount to endorsing their point of view. Neither is
there any obligation to avoid 'giving legitimacy' to certain (racist, anti-Semitic, anti-democratic etc)
worldviews by denying them a forum. It is the responsibility of the free citizen to think critically
and reject toxic political viewpoints, not the responsibility of society to shield his ears from them.
rollarn
Actually Dave, I thought I performed it pretty well. Looks like it flew right over *your* head.
Unless you really are in contact with Ahmadinejad...???
craigeryjohn
Dave, I COMPLETELY caught RN's satire...guess it was YOU who didn't get it, eh?
Dave Weinbaum replies:
'Allowing free speech to someone doesn't amount to endorsing their point of view. Neither is
there any obligation to avoid 'giving legitimacy' to certain (racist, anti-Semitic, anti-democratic etc)
worldviews by denying them a forum. It is the responsibility of the free citizen to think critically
and reject toxic political viewpoints, not the responsibility of society to shield his ears from
them.'
Whiner, I couldn't have said it better. I agree with you.
Of course we would disagree on what's '(racist, anti-Semitic, anti-democratic etc) ,' but that's and
issue for open debate.
----
Craigy and RN,
Here's why I think you miss the points of the article.
It wasn't based on whether slavery existed. That's admitted and clear in the column. It's an
analogy to what Mad is doing to Israel and could just as easily do to an ever increasing vulnerable
president and the USA. Also it shows a complicity to help Iran stall out of some ridiculous trust
Obama has for the Mullahs.
This isn't about the merits of affirmitive action, welfare etal. Its about the rants of another
madman toward a major 62 year ally, Israel. This is Hitler all over again and the world led by
Obama now and to some extent Bush before refuses to recognize the danger not just to Israel, but
to themselves. Remember, 59 million OTHER people were killed in WW2 BESIDES the murder
of six million Jews, including five million Germans.
It's meant as an expose of Obama's outward hostility to our allies and his 'outreach' to enemies
like the gov't of Iran, Russia, Syria, via his constant apology tour right up to his pitch for the
Olympics as well.
It also shows Barack's ignorance of what the Halocaust was. Recently he compared it to the
plight of the Palestinians. Six million Jews were murdered in the Halocaust, while the population
of the Palestinians has more than tripled since the UN granted Israel statehood.
There's a message here to US and Israeli Jews who overwhelmingly supported Obama. That
support has completely reversed in Israel to where 96% of Israeli Jews now believe Obama is
putting Israel in jeopardy of total destruction. There's been a precipitous drop in support of
American Jews also.
Obama has shown an amazing animosity toward other long-time US allies like Poland and
Cvechoslavakia by dropping a missile shield protecting those countries from Iran and the
Russians. Barack made that public on the 70th anniversery of the invasion of Poland by Russia.
If you want to argue other points I'd be happy to.
Please be specific, and please do some more reading. I can back up everything I say. If you prove
I'm wrong then I'll admit it and try to be more careful in the future.
Thus far I believe my views are overwhelmingly supported by historical and present fact.
Dave Whinebaum
Dave says:
'I can back up everything I say. If you prove I'm wrong then I'll admit it and try to be more
careful in the future.'
Good to see you turning over a new leaf.
Actually, how can opinions be wrong, Dave?
A fact is something that is empirically true and can be supported by / evidence / while an opinion
is a / belief / that may or may not be backed up with some type of evidence. An opinion is
normally a subjective statement that can be the result of an emotion or an individual
interpretation of a fact.
I know you feel passionately about these topics, but I want to help you become a rational person
by presenting more knowledge about the details of a given situation. You know, help you become
OBjective.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Whiner,
If I were writing a book that might be appropriate, but I'm limited by space. Typical writers go
for 650 to 750 words. With my stuff published mostly on the net there's a little more leeway, but
I'd rather make my point(s) with the minimum amount of words so it doesn't take up any more
time to read or write, and so important points don't get lost in flowery unessesary verbiage.
Lot's of 'facts' are in dispute and are challenged every day in courts of law all over the world.
Remember, at one time it was 'fact' that the earth was flat.
I believe I am objective. I know I cherish other opinions than my own, because it hones my
beliefs and makes me do more work to either justify them or change them.
Geezer Glide Taz
WTF?
Seeg103
I can't find any sources on this statement except for blogs and Dave Weinbaum.
ex-ed
It's a spoof! Can't you see it?
Geezer Glide Taz
If it was an attempt at humor I must have lost mine, as i really don't find this very funny
matrsnot
Nor do I Taz
Coyote
I know it's a spoof, but it's strange and makes no sense.
darrellmaurina
Remember that Dave Weinbaum is Jewish. I think his intent is to show the rest of non-Jewish
Americans how we would feel if we heard the Iranian president saying slavery never happened
and America should be wiped off the map, instead of him saying the holocaust never happened
and Israel should be wiped off the map.
But I'm not Dave Weinbaum so I don't know for sure...
seeg103
I hope you're getting paid for posting his stuff for him DTM because it's absolute CRAP! It's
guys like him that give conservatives a bad name!
Coyote
lol...now tell us how you really feel!
seeg103
LOL! Sorry... sugar coating isn't one of my strong suits.
Darrell Todd Maurina
Some like Dave Weinbaum, some don't.
And that's just fine with me.
I've repeatedly called Dave Weinbaum the "Rush Limbaugh of the Ozarks." There are a lot of
similarities. He's not my style, but numbers don't lie, and Weinbaum has a ** LOT ** of people
who do like his style. I do know that he's consistently getting the highest numbers of pageviews
of any of the columnists I regularly run, and higher than a lot of what I write.
Unless it's a really nasty car crash with gory photos, it's not often that I get 315 people reading
something I write within two hours of when I post it in the middle of the day before most people
are even back home from work. That's the number of readers Dave Weinbaum's column got in the
two hours since I put it up today ... and from some of my mail, there are just as many liberals in
Pulaski County who get mad at what he writes and forward it to others as there are conservatives
who like what he writes. I think he's an example of somebody lots of liberals love to hate, just as
much as some conservatives think he's funny and says angry stuff in a humorous way.
seeg103
That's a shame! His lame attempt at humor is just that and his "points" are so biased I can't even
get through an article. As much as I hate to say it I'd rather read an "article" from BlindWilly - at
least they make me laugh!
okie the thread killer
Again I have to ask, what counts as a page view? Do I have to click on your link for it to count as
a page view, or by simply reading the thread is it a page view?
CriTTer
Weinbaum needs to go flip burgers, hell his wall in his store dont even make sense except for
maybe 1 or 2 sayings. Darrell just because they click on daves article dont mean they like it,
some people just like seeing just how ignorant some of his posts are, and i too stopped reading it
1/4 of the way down. I would hit him up for more cash before i posted another...the money he
saves on lack of beef in his burgers ought to be enough to cover it
What_The?
Integrity is always the first to go when dollars are at stake.
seeg103
A little off topic but when I went to the Drudge site today they had an ad for the new Michael
Moore movie.... interesting!
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Hi all! Thanks for reading and commenting. When and if I get a chance, I'll try to respond to
comments.
BTW., go to www.daveweinbaum.com to view other columns, comments and dare I say in this
crowd...funny stuff?
"I hope you're getting paid for posting his stuff for him DTM because it's absolute CRAP! It's
guys like him that give conservatives a bad name!"
Who made you the judge of what a "conservative" should be? How about SPECIFYING where
I'm wrong? Like the toothy guy said, it's a spoof.
But I can back everything paradied with facts.
LepardLLC
Personally I think it is some of Daves best work, in the sense that it should get him a lot of traffic
and attention.
seeg103
Who made you the judge of what a "conservative" should be?
You are the self-touting "new voice of conservative America", right? Well, I guess I should just
bow to you, your definition of "conservative" and your heightened sense of intellectualism - but I
won't! And as one who considers myself "conservative" I sure don't want you speaking for me.
If you're going to advertise your views for all to see maybe you shouldn't be so sensitive and
realize you're going to take some heat - from both sides of the aisle!
Personally I think it is some of Daves best work, in the sense that it should get him a lot of traffic
and attention.
I don't view quality and attention as one in the same. The National Enquirer gets lots of attention
but I don't expect they'll be receiving a Pulitzer any time soon.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Seeg,
"Sensitive." Are you projecting here? I just asked you for facts.
Got any?
PS. I represent a quorum of 1...me.
seeg103
Seeg,
"Sensitive." Are you projecting here? I just asked you for facts.
Got any?
PS. I represent a quorum of 1...me.
Facts of what? Saying your parody is factual is an oxymoron in itself.
PS. Representing yourself is great. Stating one is the "voice" of anything indicates otherwise.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Seeg,
"Stating one is the "voice" of anything indicates otherwise."
I didn't say that and don't pretend I'm a leader of anyone, other than businesses that I own.
Again, you called my material "crap." Because? If I called your bike riding "crap" I'd have the
decency to tell you why, especially in a public forum.
LepardLLC
I get the feeling this is acomplishing nothing.
seeg103
Seeg,
"Stating one is the "voice" of anything indicates otherwise."
I didn't say that and don't pretend I'm a leader of anyone, other than businesses that I own.
Again, you called my material "crap." Because? If I called your bike riding "crap" I'd have the
decency to tell you why, especially in a public forum.
I'm sorry but I'm just reading off your website where it says, "The new voice of conservative
America."
As far as your material being "crap" I guess humor is subjective (and I should have chosen my
words more carefully). With that said, I personally find very little humor in slavery, the
Holocaust or religious satire.
What_The?
I think we all see just what kind of "man" writes this garbage from the first few responses.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
"Man" enough to put my name here.
What's yours?
okie the thread killer
just curious Dave, how did you handle hecklers at the comdey clubs?
Dave Weinbaum replies:
"just curious Dave, how did you handle hecklers at the comdey clubs?"
With humor, sarcasm, whatever I think will make 'em laugh.
*~The Maynard~*
just curious Dave, how did you handle hecklers at the comdey clubs?
I bet he didn't do any denigrating
What_The?
"Man" enough to put my name here.
What's yours?
Mine doesn't cost me money to put online, so I'll keep it anonymous.
When I have to pay someone to put my garbage online, then I'll make sure to sign my name to it,
so everyone can know how "special" I am.
LepardLLC
Mine doesn't cost me money to put online, so I'll keep it anonymous.
When I have to pay someone to put my garbage online, then I'll make sure to sign my name to it,
so everyone can know how "special" I am.
Find a better excuse, he doesn't pay anyone for his articles to appear. We welcome them.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
"Mine doesn't cost me money to put online, so I'll keep it anonymous."
When I have to pay someone to put my garbage online, then I'll make sure to sign my name to it,
so everyone can know how "special" I am.
Grandberry, is that you? ROFLMAO!!! C'mon, admit it. I won't tell anyone.
okie the thread killer
Grandberry, is that you? ROFLMAO!!! C'mon, admit it. I won't tell anyone.
Come on, you know it can't be Carl, he isn't slamming the sheriff..
CriTTer
so ...thats how you play dave? does it matter who says you stink? the fact still remains that
alot of us think what you write is total crap. now your showing your true colors. now things
are starting to get funny!
LepardLLC
That's direspectfull and needs to stop. I don't think it's that funny.. Dave is my guest and he
needs to be treated as such.
If you think i am kidding try me.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Slamming me is fine, but ought to be specific to the article and not personal. Just saying my
articles are "crap" is an insult to manure.
Are you not CAPABLE of explaining your position(s)?
Evidence continues to mount that you aren't with each post.
Went and checked the website. I believe the advertisement on top of the page referring to my
radio show says "The New Voice of Conservatism" I don't think this constitutes representation
of anyone but myself.
Therefore I retract my apology and continue my objection.
I certainly haven't run for anything and don't intend to in the future.
okie the thread killer
I read that to mean you are the NEW voice of conservatives..Thats what it leads me to believe it
means.
Dave Weinbaum replies
The "New Voice" doesn't mean I represent anyone but myself, although we could argue this
semantically.
Personally, I know I don't officially represent anyone. I haven't run for anything and no one has
voted for me.
I'm sure many support some of my ideas and not others.
CriTTer
I read that to mean you are the NEW voice of conservatives..Thats what it leads me to believe it
means.
I thought these guys were ?
shadylane
Nice video. It was similar to the post that started this topic.
seeg103
Probably semantics but you better go check the website again as when I bring it up it does NOT
say "Conservatism" but "The New Voice Of Conservative America".
shadylane
Conservative, not.... Radical, yes. It's surprising at times the things people will write in order to
make a living.
Dave Weinbaum replies:
If I did this to make a living I'd starve. I like the fact that I live in America and can write freely
about what I think and what I research.
To quote Yakoff, "VAT A COUNTRY!"
I see our freedom and liberty at risk under the current administration and will do my small part
to object.
okie the thread killer
Weren't you doing the same thing before the election? Just a different target?
Dave Weinbaum replies:
Don't understand the question. I write about what interests me most every week.